This interactive snapshot helps you quickly assess whether your current cloud practices put you at risk of cost runaway—unexpected spend spikes or slow, compounding cost creep. In a few minutes, you’ll see your risk level, the biggest drivers of exposure, and practical actions to reduce risk and improve cost control. Your inputs stay in the browser. You can export or share the results to align engineering, platform, and finance teams on what to fix first.
Progress: 0 answered, 0 N/A, 16 remaining
Resources reliably include owner/team, app/service, environment, and cost-center tags/labels; enforcement prevents untagged spend.
Budgets exist at org/account/project and team levels; alerts route to the right owners with clear thresholds.
Cost data is accessible to teams and can be tied to deployments, scaling events, and feature launches.
Teams see their bill and are accountable for keeping it healthy; platform/shared spend is allocated transparently.
Unattached disks, idle load balancers, old snapshots, unused IPs, oversized non-prod, and abandoned sandboxes are pruned automatically.
Quotas/limits, approved instance families/sizes, and policy-as-code prevent ‘one click to $10k/day’ mistakes.
Ad-hoc console changes are minimized; drift is detected and reconciled to avoid resource sprawl.
Spikes trigger a known process: identify service, owner, blast radius, and mitigations quickly.
You regularly review utilization and adjust instance sizes, DB tiers, and container requests/limits.
Autoscaling cannot scale without bounds; scaling behavior is tested against failure/misconfig scenarios.
Retention policies, sampling, and log volume controls prevent observability bills from exploding.
Where workloads are steady, you use commitments and routinely verify you’re not wasting reserved capacity.
Batch jobs, CI, dev/test, and stateless services can opportunistically reduce cost with fallback strategies.
You track and optimize cross-zone/region traffic, CDN usage, caching, and unexpected outbound data movement.
Lifecycle rules remove old versions/snapshots and move cold data to cheaper tiers; backup retention is intentional.
When spend changes, you can identify ‘what changed, where, and who owns it’ quickly.
No foundational items detected (or not enough answers yet).
Get Unlimited PTO, 401(k), Health & Dental Insurance, and many more perks when you join our team.
Curious about our team? Learn more about us on LinkedIn
and Counting
We Are Proud to be an
International Employer
Prompt engineering, RAG, and fine-tuning are not competing product categories. They are different control surfaces: prompts shape instructions, RAG supplies governed knowledge at inference time, and fine-tuning changes repeated model behavior. The right enterprise AI architecture starts with the failure mode, then adds retrieval, training, evaluation, access control, observability, auditability, and lifecycle ownership only where risk and requirements justify them.
AI-assisted software delivery is not just a coding-assistant rollout. When generation gets faster, the constraint often moves to context, tests, review, ownership, governance, and maintenance. This post lays out an AI-aware SDLC operating model.
AI made code cheap, but judgment across DevOps, data, infra, and services is still scarce. Why full-stack architects will define the next decade of software.
Sending prompts to hosted AI APIs means your source code, customer data, and internal documents leave your perimeter, protected only by a vendor’s promise. This post makes the blunt case for running open-weight models in your own cloud account, using Kimchi for the model layer and spend controls and Cast AI to autoscale GPUs on demand. It covers the real costs and objections, a way to check the economics on your own workload, and a six-step rollout starting with your most sensitive data.